Microsoft AZ-104 Korean valid exam dumps : Microsoft Azure Administrator (AZ-104 Korean Version)

Correct Answer:

Explanation:
CORRECTED ANSWER: At 9:00 AM, the scale set starts and CPU utilization is 90 percent for 15 minutes.
At 9:15 AM, 3 virtual machine instances will be running. At 10:00 AM, five instances are running and CPU falls below 15 percent for 60 minutes; at 11:00 AM, 1 virtual machine instance will be running.
Detailed Explanation
Azure Monitor autoscale evaluates the scale-out rule ' s ' Duration ' as a rolling look-back window: with CPU sustained at 90% (above the 75% threshold) from 9:00, the 10-minute duration window is first satisfied at 9:
10, triggering one scale-out action that adds 1 instance to the initial 2, giving 3 running instances -- and 9:15 is five minutes after that trigger, so 3 instances (not 2, the source document ' s original answer) are running by
9:15. For the second scenario, starting from 5 instances with CPU below 25% for a full 10-minute window repeatedly, scale-in fires roughly every 10 minutes (5- > 4- > 3- > 2- > 1), reaching the configured minimum of 1 instance around 10:30, well before 11:00 AM, so exactly 1 instance remains running -- this matches the source key and is left unchanged.
Official Reference
Understand autoscale settings - evaluation and duration - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure- monitor/autoscale/autoscale-understanding-settings

Correct Answer: C  🗳️

Explanation: Only visible for ValidDumps members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).

Correct Answer:

Explanation:
CORRECTED ANSWER: Statement 1 (RG1 has Tag2:IT only): Yes. Statement 2 (storage1 has all four tags):
No. Statement 3 (VNET1 has Tag2:IT and Tag3:value2 only): No.
Detailed Explanation
The built-in ' Append a tag and its value to resources ' policy runs in Indexed mode, which Microsoft Learn documentation explicitly states does not evaluate resource groups or subscriptions - only actual taggable
/locatable resource types. So even though RG1 is in-scope and not excluded, the Append effect never fires against it, and RG1 keeps only its manually assigned Tag2:IT (Statement 1 = Yes). storage1 is a resource, in scope and not excluded, so tagging it with Tag3:value1 triggers Append, adding Tag4:value4 - giving it two tags total, never Tag1:subscription or Tag2:IT, since Azure tags never automatically inherit or cascade from a subscription or resource group down to child resources (Statement 2 = No). VNET1 is explicitly excluded (Sub1/RG1/VNET1), so Append never applies to it, and it keeps only its own Tag3:value2 - it never acquires RG1 ' s Tag2:IT, since tags don ' t cascade (Statement 3 = No). The exhibit ' s raw coordinates invert all three answers; the documented Indexed-mode scope exclusion and non-inheritance of tags support the corrected answers above.
Official Reference
Azure Policy definition structure: mode (Indexed vs all) - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure
/governance/policy/concepts/definition-structure-basics

Correct Answer:

Explanation:
CORRECTED ANSWER: VM2 can connect to the TCP port 1433 services on VM1: Yes. VM1 can connect to the TCP port 1433 services on VM2: Yes. VM2 can connect to the TCP port 1433 services on VM3: Yes.
Detailed Explanation
Microsoft Learn ' s NSG documentation confirms that rules are evaluated strictly by priority NUMBER, lowest first, with processing stopping at the first match - specificity never overrides priority. NSG2 ' s priority-101 Allow rule (source 10.10.2.0/24 # destination 10.10.1.0/24, port 1433) is evaluated before the priority-125 Block rule and already matches VM2#VM1 traffic (10.10.2.5 is within 10.10.2.0/24; 10.10.1.5 is within 10.10.1.0/24), so the traffic is allowed and the more specific priority-125 block is never reached - the source document ' s original ' No ' for this statement is corrected to Yes. Subnet1 ' s NSG1 has no custom rules shown, so its default AllowVnetInBound rule permits this same intra-VNet traffic. VM1#VM2 traffic is outbound from VM1 (unaffected by NSG2 ' s inbound-only rules, permitted by default outbound rules) and inbound to VM2, which has no NSG at all - unrestricted, so Yes. VM2 and VM3 share Subnet2, which has no NSG, and neither VM has a NIC-level NSG, so that traffic is also unrestricted - Yes.
Official Reference
Network security group rules - priority-based evaluation, not specificity-based - https://learn.microsoft.com
/en-us/azure/virtual-network/network-security-groups-overview

Correct Answer:

Explanation:
Detailed Explanation
An internal (private) load balancer distributes incoming connections evenly across a backend pool of virtual machines using a hashing algorithm, making it the correct choice for spreading traffic equally between the web-server tier and the business-logic tier. Protection against Layer-7 threats such as SQL injection requires a Web Application Firewall, and on Azure this is delivered specifically by an Application Gateway configured with the WAF tier (or WAF_v2 SKU) -- the Standard tier Application Gateway performs only Layer-7 load balancing and URL routing without any WAF rule engine, so it cannot detect or block SQL injection payloads. An NSG filters by IP/port only and inspects no HTTP payload content. Both selections match the source key.
Official Reference
Azure Web Application Firewall on Application Gateway - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/web- application-firewall/ag/ag-overview