Juniper JN0-694 valid exam dumps : Enterprise Routing and Switching Support, Professional (JNCSP-ENT)

Reading about the exam and sitting the exam are different skills. The ValidDumps test engines simulate the Juniper Enterprise Routing and Switching Support, Professional (JNCSP-ENT) environment closely enough that by exam day, the JN0-694 format feels like a routine you have already rehearsed.

Juniper JN0-694 Exam Overview:

Certification Vendor:	Juniper Networks
Exam Name:	Enterprise Routing and Switching Support, Professional
Exam Number:	JN0-694
Exam Duration:	120 minutes
Available Languages:	English, Japanese
Exam Price:	$300 USD
Certificate Validity Period:	3 years
Exam Format:	Drag-and-drop, Multiple choice, Simulations, Scenario-based
Passing Score:	65%
Related Certifications:	JNCIS-ENT JNCIE-ENT JNCIP-ENT
Real Exam Qty:	52–65
Recommended Training:	Juniper Official Enterprise Support Training Junos Enterprise Routing and Switching Support Courses
Exam Registration:	Pearson VUE Registration Juniper Certification Portal
Sample Questions:
Exam Way:	Proctored exam, available online or at Pearson VUE test centers
Pre Condition:	No mandatory prerequisites; JNCIS-ENT or 2+ years of Junos enterprise support experience recommended
Official Syllabus URL:	https://www.juniper.net/us/en/training/certification/resources/jncsp-ent/

Juniper JN0-694 Exam Syllabus Topics:

JN0-694 Exam Essentials: Frequently Asked Questions

Juniper Enterprise Routing and Switching Support, Professional (JNCSP-ENT) Sample Questions:

Question 1

Referring to the exhibit, an administrator has configured dot1q-tunneling on the VLAN, but LLDP is not being tunneled.

What is causing the problem?

A. LLDP needs to be enabled as a protocol to tunnel.
B. LLDP needs to be disabled on the tunneling device.
C. LLDP tunneling only works on trunked interfaces.
D. LLDP can only be processed one hop away.

Question 2

-- Exhibit -user@router> show route protocol bgp detail
inet.0: 20 destinations, 20 routes (19 active, 0 holddown, 1 hidden) 10.222.1.3/32 (1 entry, 1 announced) *BGP Preference: 170/-101 Next hop type: Indirect Address: 0x15ec944 Next-hop reference count: 3 Source: 1.1.1.1 Next hop type: Router, Next hop index: 536 Next hop: 1.1.1.1 via ge-0/0/1.0, selected Protocol next hop: 1.1.1.1 Indirect next hop: 14081d0 262142 State: Local AS: 65222 Peer AS: 65221 Age: 2:12 MetriC. 1 Metric2: 0 Task: BGP_65221.1.1.1.1+56417 Announcement bits (2): 0-KRT 4-Resolve tree 1 AS path: 65221 I Communities: no-advertise Accepted Localpref: 100 Router ID. 10.222.1.1 -- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
You are troubleshooting a problem where an EBGP route is not being advertised to your local IBGP peers. You have received a 10.222.1.3/32 route from an EBGP peer as shown in the exhibit, but the route is not being advertised.
What is causing the problem?

A. The community prevents the route from being advertised.
B. The route shows as a hidden route and cannot be advertised.
C. The local preference value is too high for the route to be advertised.
D. The next hop for the route is indirect and prevents the route from being advertised.

Question 3

-- Exhibit --
Jun 12 02:56:06 R1 rpd[60735]: RPD_OSPF_NBRDOWN: OSPF neighbor 10.50.10.25 (realm ospf-v2 fe-0/0/4.0 area 0.0.0.0) state changed from Full to Init due to 1WayRcvd (event reason: neighbor is in one-way mode)
Jun 12 02:59:36 R1 rpd[60735]: RPD_OSPF_NBRUP: OSPF neighbor 10.50.10.25 (realm ospf-v2 fe-0/0/4.0 area 0.0.0.0) state changed from Init to ExStart due to 2WayRcvd (event reason: neighbor detected this router)
Jun 12 02:59:36 R1 rpd[60735]: RPD_OSPF_NBRUP: OSPF neighbor 10.50.10.25 (realm ospf-v2 fe-0/0/4.0 area 0.0.0.0) state changed from Exchange to Full due to ExchangeDone (event reason: DBD exchange of slave completed)
-- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
You notice that there is a problem with the OSPF adjacency between two routers, R1 and R2. The relevant system logs from R1 are shown in the exhibit.
What would cause this behavior?

A. There is an OSPF hello timer mismatch between the two routers.
B. R1's interface went down and came back up.
C. R2 was dropping R1's OSPF hello packets.
D. R1 was dropping R2's OSPF hello packets.

Question 4

An end user on interface ge-0/0/1.0 is trying to receive a multicast stream for 232.0.0.1 sourced from but is not receiving it. You use the show igmp group command and do not see this group in the list. You enable traceoptions for IGMP and find the following IGMPv3 report from the end user's host:
Jun 10 13:11:03.577641 RCV IGMP V3 Report len 16 from 192.168.1.13 intf ge-0/0/1.0
Jun 10 13:11:03.577984 Records 1
Jun 10 13:11:03.578027 Group 232.0.0.1, type IS_EX, aux_len 0, sources 0
Which configuration change is required to allow the group to be added in the router?

A. set routing-options multicast ssm-groups 232.0.0.1/32
B. set routing-options multicast asm-override-ssm
C. set protocols igmp interface ge-0/0/1.0 group-limit 2
D. set protocols igmp interface ge-0/0/1.0 promiscuous-mode

Question 5

You observe that a router is using an unusually high amount of CPU cycles. You determine that continuous SPF calculations in OSPF are being performed.
What are two reasons for this problem? (Choose two.)

A. The wrong authentication keys between the OSPF neighbors are used.
B. An OSPF adjacency is flapping.
C. The interface MTU is mismatched between the OSPF neighbors.
D. There are duplicate router IDs within the OSPF area.

Solutions: